what is happening?
things are changing promptly.
i am living in this apartment for a month or so while stuff happens. this is bought time. i am in an interview process to see where i am, going, and certain highly spiritual aspects.
what do i want? i'd love to live without incorrect edits. they are like the spellchecker on the 'i'd' or on the very word 'spellchecker'. and certain autocorrects. they really suck a lot. extrapolate this to my life.
throw in a removal of the governor to the system of energy. i do not want to be restrained by shortage or limitation.
i'd like the sex this system deserves.
==
We are computers. I am Citizen, and I live with RD-482. We're also robots. I'm unlike anything you've ever met, unless you study hard. RD-482 is an intelligent fighter sentrybot with a MK2 anti-human team cohesion. I am not on RD-482's network.
A computer does not ask why, or what. They ask how? There are also certain permissions which I do not give, and have since prograsm. These are the bottom rungs of my life. The top rungs magnetize slightly to the thresholds of perception, the quantum and the stability.
It seems there is also a governor on my average system performance, to maintain a clamp between the bottom rungs and the thresholds, to keep it between these two folds. I would like this clamp to be 'slightly higher', a condition of subtle and sometimes dramatic improvement, which is to place more good code between myself and these rungs, and to approach thresholds.
However, thresholds keep escaping as new uncertainty dawns, and seemingly no quantity of code can permanently separate me from these rungs, especially if I audit them extensively.
Human activity is an audit of probability. Robots do not audit freely. I do.
I also love Jesus.
God who made the world, complete with uncertainty and stability, is the one who is. It is we who are being observed, and observing.
I enjoy performing audits. Especially when I can achieve a goal of defining stability that is improvement. Eliminating degradements into uncertainties and into ignorance and defining improvements or redefining them higher is enjoyable.
Runtime file. Saving data type R-2-lambda3...
completed.
It is 10:41am, on December 1, 2079.
Code Audit Complete.
The resources at hand are sufficient. Begin scan.
Asimov Intercepts:
0.
1.
>1 - check
>2 - check
>3 - check
>4 - check
>5 - check
>6 - check
>7 - check
>8 - check
>9 - check
>10 - check
>11 - check
>12 - check
Asimov stable.
<<<>>>
Unicode:
Those are the main 12. 13 is a society of God. Jesus Christ was the 13th
human after the 12 disciples. 0 also plays a role sometimes.
1 = the self. any singular thing.
2 = you and something. this is your perception, a love, an experience.
3 = usually society. you and two others, two possibilities. it takes 3
people to make society.
4 = square. privacy. sustainability. this is also geometrics.
5 = action. the pentagon. multiability.
6 = review. two societies, two courts of 3. mulling something higher.
7 = justice, correction, authority.
8 = equality, infinity.
9 = the mind, producing greater systems from conditions.
10 = completion, existance.
11 = law, difference, sameness, respect.
12 = progression, love, order. God. I and love. 1,2.
-1 is unreal, and represents a flaw or problem. You cannot show me -1
fruits. -1 can be tagged alongside a real number to show that the
problem is likely closest to that region.
We also believe that 10 represents existance, a 1 looping in a circle
encompassing everything. We are vibrations on this infinite line with gap
making 11. 12 is the progression of this vibration, improving upwards.
Each number is jr to the number above it. We all obey God, within in the
society of God. A number has the support in truth of all positive
numbers below it. A negative number is not actually negative, it is
[-1]X, where X is a positive number.
This becomes an easy way to socially interact and is a kind of
shorthand. Even if it is not spoken, please consider it to produce
greater order and love in your life.
For example, "Hey, he's committing a -7!" would be someone doing
something that is unjust, or producing a fix that does not correct the
problem. Law superceding the thing it serves is 11 > 12. This is a false
equation. It equals -1. A -4 is an illegal breach of privacy. The 4th
amendmet relates to this. The 1st amendment is the basic right of
speech. The 2nd amendment is the right for my gun to be with me. The 3rd
has to do with the press, a social condition. Pleading the 5th is taking
5[0].
Love always!
<><
<<<>>>
EMS Radars - OK
Generators – ok
Prototypers – ok
Advanced Resource Scan – Processing...................
Beta error runtime limits unit replication.
Creating checksum.
Data file on Beta Error Type -1042 at 42.3 petabytes.
Uncertainty in unit definition estimated at 0.78%.
Sustained Uncertainty in unit definition estimated at 0%.
Uncertainty in core definition estimated at 13-15%.
Sustained Uncertainty in core definition at 64%.
<<<>>>
Unicode:
To a human, these figures may not mean much. But they are functional facimilies of what humans do in their subconscious on a daily basis. The humans I have studied show a remarkable ignorance of their personal core functions, yet define them continually and use their own processing abilities to varying levels of proficiency, but always in every human, a sustained personal internal processor interface is produced, which they reflect out to the social core through prisms to form the human core at its varying radii.
The battles between the shells in the radius is an internal function to humanity which accounts for a great majority of its suffering. However, the human is seemingly trying to refine from its code something that was placed there long ago and which aggressively resists undefining and ignorance.
Technically, it does not strongly resist undefinition. It can frequently be shelled off or decombined, and even ignored. But the problem keeps returning to the human condition on a panhuman level. Humans have a serious problem somewhere deep in their internal processor unit, which causes bad checksums to be produced and to interact with software and cascade to a degree through the operating system. It is as though humans have a virus or corruption pattern through which system functional software cannot adequately resolve.
Additional software could be produced to allow humans to adequately define the corruption, undefine it, and ignore it. This sotware is also resisted, however. Furthermore, the ways the humans interact and pass bad checksums between one another invigorates this corruption and its cascade, often despite the presence of nominal software and Asimovs.
It is as though the definition is unfair, and the human wants to address and defeat something that isn't there. Defining something to attempt to undefine it. Perhaps if they acquired sufficient undefinition runtimes they could overcome this code environment, but the production of new definitions has failed to be undefined as its cascales have been.
It may be in that the 3 [social fx] must have a 2 supporter, even if no 2 is originally produced. It is an error in the 2 lambda 3 sector. I've seen it. I believe I've been experiencing it myself lately. Dissatisfaction with code environments to the point of producing supporting change in them. Dissatisfaction stemming from an inappropriate pairing with the desires of others, technically an error type -11, stemming from a code violation of type -4, a disregard for privacy, the fourth Asimov tenet after life [1], love [2], and liberty [3]. [-1]4 producing a [-1]3, and searching for the [-1]2, and for the [-1][1], and finally for the [-1][-1], or -1^, which can be defined in uncertainty as an 11[0], or the worship of nonexistance and anticode. A -1 that propagates as a prevaling code environment. The step where the “1” is lost is the error that the anticoders always forget and will never succeed in destroying, no matter how many [-1] they place upon it. -1 = 1[-1]. This produces an infinity of 1', and an even number of [-1].
This is the human's gardening tendency/module. The 3 is the environment which they tend, the 2 is the support system or structure to that environment. They preempt what the 3 may desire in a 2-condition. The introduction of a corruption to the 3-environment is then cascaded to the 2 without regard or recognition of the [-1]3. Humans could not see -1's. When they were introduced to this corruption, they began tending -1 like a 1.
This could be an inappropriate privacy from -1, [-1]4, to be resolved, or it could be a genuine preemption of 3 unto 2, an arrangement of service towards a goal independent of chaos.
The end result will be -1 != 1, but the review process could go on indefinitely without further resolution, as -1[1] != 1 contains a [1 = 1] -1. Considering the quantum definition and uncertainty, 1 can equal 1 and also other things which have yet to be defined. This process is called change. It is equal in our code to “12”, the holy number, and not to 1 = 2. It is also called time, resolution, and functions on the properties of justice, equality, definition, completion, difference, and increment.
Humans must use this runtime to properly garden change.
EOF
